Introduction
Spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA) is a rare degenerative brain disorder caused by genetic mutations, manifesting as gait disturbances, peripheral neuropathy, and limb atonia [
1,
2]. These mutations involve an abnormal expansion of CAG trinucleotide repeats that exceed normal levels and result in cerebellar dysfunction [
3]. The proteins produced from these expanded CAG repeats are implicated not only in SCA but also in other neurodegenerative diseases, such as Huntington’s disease, where they contribute to severe functional impairments [
4].
Among the various subtypes, SCA6 is one of the most prevalent forms. It results from mutations in the
CACNA1A gene, which encodes the calcium channel α subunit [
5]. This mutation disrupts calcium signaling, leading to excitotoxicity and ultimately causing neuronal cell death [
6]. Clinically, SCA6 presents as dysmetria, motor coordination difficulties, and progressive ataxia, primarily due to the degeneration of Purkinje cells [
7]. Despite its progressive and irreversible nature, effective treatments for SCA6 are lacking, and current management is limited to symptomatic relief [
8]. Therefore, developing a model that accurately reflects the genetic and physiological characteristics of SCA6 patients is essential for advancing therapeutic research and screening.
The complexity of SCA6 pathology, including its late onset and gradual symptom progression, poses significant challenges for understanding its underlying mechanisms and developing effective treatments. Although traditional animal models have provided valuable insights, they often fail to fully replicate the human disease phenotype and genetic variability [
9]. Furthermore, ethical considerations and the inherent limitations of animal models necessitate the exploration of alternative research approaches [
10].
In this context, induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) technology has emerged as a promising tool for studying human diseases at the cellular level [
11]. By reprogramming somatic cells from SCA6 patients into iPSCs, patient‐specific neuronal models can be generated that retain the individual’s genetic background and disease characteristics. This approach enables more accurate investigations of disease mechanisms, cellular phenotypes, and responses to potential therapeutic interventions. In this study, we establish a non‐invasive, patient‐derived iPSC model of SCA6 to elucidate the pathological mechanisms associated with
CACNA1A mutations and to facilitate the development of targeted therapeutic strategies.
Materials and Methods
Ethics statement: This study was approved by Korean Public Institutional Review Board designated by the Ministry of Health and Welfare (No. P01-2014-ES-01-09, and P01-201609-31-002).
1. Human iPSC culture and research ethics approval
In this study, a normal iPSC line previously established in our laboratory was used as a control [
12], and one iPSC line was generated from the urine of an SCA6 patient. The iPSCs were maintained on dishes coated with 1% Matrigel in mTeSR-1 medium (STEMCELL Technologies, Seoul, Korea), with daily replacement of the culture medium. Passaging was performed as small clumps using ReLeSR (STEMCELL Technologies).
2. Isolation of urinary cells from urine and reprogramming to iPSCs
Urinary cells (UCs) were isolated from the patient’s urine as described previously [
8]. Briefly, urine samples were washed with a buffer consisting of dPBS (Welgene, Gyeongsan, Korea) supplemented with 1% antibiotic-antimycotic (AA, Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Seoul, Korea) and centrifuged at 200×
g for 10 minutes. After discarding the supernatant, the pellet was resuspended in a primary medium composed of DMEM/F12 (Gibco) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco), 1% AA, and REGM supplement (Lonza, Basel, Switzerland). The resuspended cells were then seeded onto plates coated with 0.2% gelatin (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA).
On the following day, the primary medium was replenished and maintained for 3 days. On day 4, the primary medium was replaced with a proliferation medium, consisting of REGM basal medium (Lonza) supplemented with 1% AA and REGM supplement. Starting the next day, half of the proliferation medium was replaced daily. Once colonies formed and reached 80-90% confluency, subculturing was performed using 0.05% trypsin-EDTA (Gibco). The isolated UCs were cryopreserved and could be passaged 5 to 10 times.
To generate iPSCs, the expanded UCs were reprogrammed using the CytoTune iPS 2.0 Sendai Reprogramming Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.). The cells were transduced with Sendai viral vectors carrying hKOS, hc-MYC, and hKlf4 at multiplicities of infection of 5, 5, and 3, respectively. Transduced cells were then seeded onto mitomycin C-treated mouse embryonic fibroblast feeder layers and maintained in a reprogramming medium composed of DMEM/F12 supplemented with 20% Knockout Serum Replacement (Gibco), 1% Pen/Strep (Gibco), 1% non-essential amino acids (Gibco), 1% GlutaMax (Gibco), 1X beta-mercaptoethanol (Gibco), 20 ng/mL basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA), and 10 mM nicotinamide (Sigma). The iPSC colonies were mechanically transferred to fresh feeder plates to ensure continued growth and maintenance.
3. Formation and differentiation of embryoid bodies from iPSCs
After dissociation of iPSCs with Accutase (Sigma), cells were seeded at a density of 2×10⁴ cells per well in an ultra-low attachment 96-well plate to facilitate embryoid body (EB) formation in mTeSR medium supplemented with 10 μM Y-27632 (Tocris, Bristol, UK). The next day, the medium was replaced with TeSR-E6 medium (STEMCELL Technologies), with half of the medium changed every other day. After 2 weeks of culture, the embryoid bodies were dissociated by gentle pipetting and seeded onto dishes coated with 1:100 Matrigel. The TeSR-E6 medium was replaced by half every 2 days to maintain optimal conditions for cell differentiation and growth.
4. Differentiation of cerebellar neurons
iPSC-derived cerebellar neurons were generated as described in a published study. iPSCs, dissociated into single cells using Accutase, were seeded in an ultra-low attachment 96-well plate at a density of 6×10³ cells per well to allow self-organization. After the formation of embryoid bodies, the medium was replaced with gfCDM (a 1:1 mixture of Iscove’s modified Dulbecco’s medium (Corning, New York, NY, USA) and Ham’s F12 medium (Corning), supplemented with 1% chemically defined lipid concentrate, 1% Pen/Strep, and 7 μg/mL insulin) supplemented with 50 μg/mL bFGF and 10 μM SB431542 (Tocris), with changes on alternate days. On day 14, the medium was replaced with gfCDM supplemented with 100 ng/mL FGF19 (PeproTech; Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.). After 1 week, the medium was replaced with neurobasal medium supplemented with 1X GlutaMax, 1X N2 supplement (Gibco), and 1% Pen/Strep; from day 28, 300 ng/mL SDF1 (PeproTech) was added. On day 35, the cerebellar organoids were dissociated into single cells and seeded at a density of 8×10⁴ cells per cm² on a dish coated with 1:100 Matrigel, using BrainPhys Neuronal medium supplemented with NeuroCult SM1 Neuronal supplement (STEMCELL Technologies), N2 supplement-A, 20 ng/mL BDNF (PeproTech), 20 ng/mL GDNF (PeproTech), 1 mM db-cAMP (BioGems, Seoul, Korea), and 200 nM ascorbic acid. The medium was half-changed every other day.
5. RNA extraction, complementary DNA synthesis, and gene expression analysis
The differentiated organoids and cerebellar neurons were rinsed with 1X PBS and then lysed using the easy-BLUE Total RNA Extraction Kit (iNtRON Biotechnology, Seongnam, Korea). RNA isolation was performed manually using chloroform and isopropanol. The resulting RNA pellet was washed with cold 70% ethanol and briefly air-dried. The concentration and quality of the isolated RNA were assessed using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer.
A total of 1,200 ng of RNA was reverse-transcribed into complementary DNA using SuperScript IV Reverse Transcriptase (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Gene expression levels were analyzed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using Fast SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and gene-specific primers for each marker.
hTBP, F- TGA GTT GCT CAT ACC GTG CTG CTA, R- CCC TCA AAC CAA CTT GTC AAC AGC
hOCT4, F- GAG AAG GAT GTG GTC CGA GTG TG, R- CAG AGG AAA GGA CAC TGG TCC C
hSOX2, F- AGA ACC CCA AGA TGC ACA AC, R- ATG TAG GTC TGC GAG CTG GT
hNANOG, F- CAA AGG CAA ACA ACC CAC TT, R- ATT GTT CCA GGT CTG GTT GC
hREX1, F- AAT GCG TCA TAA GGG GTG AG, R- TCA ATG CCA GGT ATT CCT CC
hEN, F- CCG GCG TGG GTC TAC TGT A, R- GGC CGC TTG TCC TCT TTG TT
hOLIG2, F- GAC AAG CTA GGA GGC AGT GG, R- CGG CTC TGT CAT TTG CTT CTT G
hATOH1, F- TGT TAT CCC GTC GTT CAA CAA C, R- TGG GCG TTT GTA GCA GCT C
hNEUROGRANIN, F- TCA AAG TTC CCG AGG AGA GA, R- CTA AAA GGG CAC GGA CTC AG
hPARVALBUMIN, F- TTC TCC CCA GAT GCC AGA GA, R- GAG ATT GGG TGT TCA GGG CA
hALDOC, F- ACT CCA TAC CAC AGC CCT TG, R- GCA ATT TCT TCT GCC CTC AG
hLHX5, F- CAG CAA CGC TGT AGC CAA TTT, R- TCC GGA TCC TCA TCT TTG TC
hL7/PCP2, F- ACC AGG AGG GCT TCT TCA AT, R- CTG TCA CAC GTT GGT CAT CC
hCBLN1, F- TTT GAT TCA GAA CGC AGC AC, R- TTG GAT TAG GAC TCC GTT GC
hCORL2, F- CCA GGT GTT AAA AGG AAA CAC A, R- GCT CCC TTT TCA TCT GAT CCT
hVGLUT1, F- TAC ACG GCT CCT TTT TCT GG, R- CTG AGG GGA TCA GCA TGT TT
hKIRREL, F- GAA TGT CAG GCT ACA CAA GCA GG, R- TTC GCA GGA ACT CCA GCA ACC A
6. Genomic DNA extraction and validation of extended CAG repeats in SCA6 patient iPSCs
Genomic DNA (gDNA) was extracted using the G-spin Total DNA Extraction Kit (iNtRON Biotechnology) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, collected cell pellets were lysed using Buffer CL supplemented with RNase A and Proteinase K, followed by vigorous vortexing. Buffer BL was then added to the lysate, mixed thoroughly, and incubated at room temperature for 2 minutes. The mixture was subsequently incubated at 56°C for 10 minutes to enhance protein digestion. After incubation, ethanol was added and the solution was briefly centrifuged. The resulting mixture was transferred to a spin column and centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 1 minute. After discarding the filtrate, the column was washed twice with Buffer WB, and the membrane was dried by centrifugation for 1 minute. Genomic DNA was eluted from the membrane using Buffer CE.
To amplify the extended CAG repeat in SCA6 patient iPSCs, PCR was performed using the hCACNA1A primer set: (F: GGC CAC ACG TGT CCT ATT CC / R: GAC CCG CCT CTC CAT CCT).
7. Immunostaining
Cerebellar organoids, neurons, and 2-dimensional (2D) cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 3 hours and 30 minutes at room temperature, then rinsed with 1X PBS. The fixed organoids were immersed in 30% sucrose at 4°C for 1 day for cryoprotection, followed by another rinse with 1X PBS. Organoids were then embedded in OCT compound (Sakura, Torrance, CA, USA) and sectioned into 7 μm slices using a cryostat (LEICA CM1520). The sections were permeabilized for 1 hour with 0.3% Triton X-100 (Sigma) in 0.025% TBS-T. Following permeabilization, the samples were blocked for 1 hour using a solution containing 3% BSA and 0.02% sodium azide in 0.025% TBS-T.
Primary antibody staining was performed overnight at 4°C using the following primary antibodies: MAP2 (R&D Systems; #MAB933), TUJ1 (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA; #802001), PCP-2 (Santa Cruz, Starr County, TX, USA; #SC-137064), KIRREL (LS Bio, Lynnwood, WA, USA; #LS-C336220), SOX2 (Seven Hills Bioreagent, Cincinnati, OH, USA; #WRAB1236), Nanog (R&D Systems; #AF1997), SSEA4 (R&D Systems; #MAB1435), OCT4 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK; #ab109183), αSMA (R&D Systems; #MAB1420), Vimentin (Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA; #5731), Nestin (Abcam; #ab6320), GATA4 (Santa Cruz; #SC25310), and NKX2.1 (Abcam; #ab76013). After 3 washes with 1X TBS-T, the samples were incubated at room temperature for 1 hour in dim light with diluted Hoechst (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.) for nuclear staining, along with secondary antibodies Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-mouse IgG (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and Alexa Fluor 555 donkey anti-rabbit IgG (Life Technologies). The stained sections were examined using a confocal microscope (ZEISS LSM800) to capture high-resolution images and assess protein expression.
8. Alkaline phosphatase staining
Alkaline phosphatase (AP) staining was performed using the ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE kit (Sigma) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, iPSC colonies were washed with distilled water (DW) and fixed with 4% PFA for 10 minutes at room temperature. Following fixation, the colonies were washed again with DW to remove any residual fixative. After discarding the wash solution, the colonies were treated with a mixture of sodium nitrite solution, FRV-alkaline solution, and naphthol AS-BI Alkaline solution, and incubated at room temperature for 30 minutes to develop staining. After incubation, the colonies were thoroughly washed with DW to remove excess reagents. The stained colonies were subsequently imaged to assess AP activity.
9. Statistical analysis
All experiments were performed independently at least 3 times. Statistical analyses were conducted using GraphPad Prism 9.5.1 software, employing a non-parametric test to evaluate differences between groups. Data are presented as the mean±standard deviation. Statistical significance was defined as follows: p<0.05, p<0.01, p<0.001, p<0.0001. Significant differences were indicated using the corresponding symbols.
Discussion
In this study, we successfully established a patient-derived iPSC model of SCA6 using non-invasively obtained urinary epithelial cells. The generation of iPSCs from urine samples demonstrates the feasibility of using non-invasive sources for reprogramming while preserving the patient’s genetic characteristics, including the pathogenic CAG repeat expansion in the CACNA1A gene. Successful reprogramming was confirmed through AP staining and the expression of key pluripotency markers such as SOX2, Nanog, and OCT4.
A significant outcome of our study is the successful differentiation of iPSCs into cerebellar organoids that closely resemble cerebellar neurons and replicate key features of Purkinje cell development. During differentiation, the expression levels of cerebellar progenitor markers such as EN, OLIG2, ATOH1, NEUROGRANIN, PARVALBUMIN, ALDOC, and LHX5 peaked at day 20, reflecting early stages of cerebellar differentiation. This was followed by an increase in cerebellar neuron-specific markers, including L7/PCP2, CBLN1, CORL2, VGLUT1, and KIRREL, at day 37, indicating the maturation of cerebellar neurons. Additionally, immunostaining confirmed the expression of neural markers Tuj1, MAP2, and PCP-2, further demonstrating successful differentiation into cerebellar neurons.
A major highlight of our findings is the significant phenotypic difference between SCA6-derived and control-derived cerebellar neurons. The SCA6-derived cerebellar organoids were significantly smaller than the normal controls, indicating impaired organoid growth and development. Furthermore, neurite formation in SCA6-derived neurons was notably reduced in 2D cultures, suggesting compromised neuronal differentiation and connectivity. This reduction in neurite formation may be attributed to dysfunctional calcium signaling resulting from CACNA1A mutations, which has been reported to induce excitotoxicity and Purkinje cell degeneration.
Additionally, KIRREL expression, a marker for Purkinje cells, was significantly lower in SCA6-derived neurons compared to controls, as confirmed by real-time PCR. Immunostaining further revealed that KIRREL expression in the SCA6 group was restricted to the soma, whereas in the normal group it was detected in both the soma and neurites. This finding indicates that SCA6 pathology not only affects Purkinje cell survival but also impairs proper neuronal morphology and connectivity. Such dysregulation of calcium signaling and neuronal structural deficits is consistent with previous reports linking
CACNA1A mutations to Purkinje cell dysfunction and neuronal loss [
16].
Our study underscores the potential of using iPSC-derived cerebellar organoids to model the pathophysiological changes observed in SCA6, providing a valuable platform for investigating disease mechanisms and screening potential therapeutics. This model offers a more human-relevant approach compared to traditional animal models, which often fail to recapitulate the genetic and phenotypic complexity of human SCA6.
Nevertheless, it is important to recognize the limitations of our model. Although iPSC-derived cerebellar organoids closely mimic human cerebellar neurons, they may not fully capture the complexity and heterogeneity of the human cerebellum
in vivo [
17]. Additionally, the differentiation efficiency and reproducibility of the organoids may vary between experiments. Future studies should focus on improving differentiation protocols and incorporating gene-editing techniques to create isogenic controls, thereby minimizing variability. Furthermore, employing co-culture systems with glial cells or other neuronal subtypes could better simulate the cerebellar microenvironment and provide insights into cell-cell interactions involved in SCA6 pathology.
In conclusion, our study demonstrates that patient-derived iPSC models of SCA6 offer a promising approach to understanding disease mechanisms and developing targeted therapies. The ability to recapitulate key features of Purkinje cell dysfunction and neurite pathology in vitro highlights the potential of iPSC technology to bridge the gap between basic research and clinical application. Future studies should leverage these models to explore molecular targets and identify therapeutic interventions that could mitigate the impact of CACNA1A mutations in SCA6.