Organoid > Volume 5; 2025 > Article
Lim, Kang, and Jung: The role of RhoA/ROCK singaling pathway in organoid research

Abstract

Rho-associated coiled-coil containing protein kinase (ROCK) signaling is a primary regulator of cell behavior in stem cell biology and organoid systems. This review examines the diverse roles of Rho/ROCK signaling in cytoskeletal remodeling, cell adhesion, differentiation, and mechanotransduction. Special emphasis is placed on its role in organoid formation, patterning, and functional maturation. An understanding of how this pathway integrates with other signaling networks, such as Ras, Hippo, and PI3K-AKT, is crucial for optimizing organoid fidelity. We propose future research directions that enhance organoid models through targeted modulation of ROCK activity, thereby opening new opportunities for regenerative medicine and disease modeling.

Introduction

Organoid technology is a revolutionary advancement in biomedical research, enabling the creation of three-dimensional, miniaturized, and self-organizing tissue models derived from stem cells [1,2]. These in vitro systems recapitulate key aspects of tissue architecture and function, serving as powerful platforms for studying development, disease mechanisms, drug screening, and regenerative therapies [3,4]. Among the numerous molecular pathways governing organoid generation, the Rho/Rho-associated coiled-coil containing protein kinase (ROCK) signaling axis plays a particularly critical role [5,6]. This pathway regulates cytoskeletal tension, cell polarity, adhesion, and other survival-related processes essential for the self-organization and morphogenesis of organoids [7,8]. ROCK inhibitors are widely used to improve the survival of dissociated stem cells, prevent apoptosis, and facilitate initial cell aggregation, rendering them indispensable during early organoid formation [9]. Furthermore, fine-tuning Rho/ROCK activity has been shown to influence organoid patterning and lineage specification [10-12]. Therefore, a deeper understanding of how Rho/ROCK signaling integrates with stem cell fate and microenvironmental cues is essential for advancing organoid fidelity and functionality [13].

Molecular mechanisms of Rho/ROCK pathway

Ethics statement: This study constituted a comprehensive analysis of previously released studies and thus, was not subject to the approval of the institutional review board.

The Rho/ROCK signaling axis coordinates multiple downstream cascades critical to organoid development by regulating cytoskeletal dynamics, mechanical tension, and cell-matrix interactions. At the core of this pathway is Ras homolog family member A (RhoA), a small GTPase activated in response to mechanical stimuli or growth factor signaling. In its active, GTP-bound state, RhoA binds to and activates its primary effector, ROCK, which exists in two isoforms: ROCK1 and ROCK2 [14].
Upon activation, ROCK mediates several key signaling pathways. One of the best characterized is the ROCK-myosin light chain (MLC) pathway, in which ROCK directly phosphorylates MLC while concurrently inhibiting myosin light chain phosphatase. This dual action enhances actomyosin contractility, thereby reinforcing cytoskeletal tension and enabling morphogenetic movements in developing organoids [15-18].
In parallel, ROCK activates LIM domain kinase (LIMK), which phosphorylates and inactivates cofilin, a key actin-severing protein. The resulting ROCK-LIMK-cofilin axis stabilizes filamentous actin (F-actin) and supports cytoskeletal remodeling. These structural changes are vital for cell migration, neurite outgrowth, and the maintenance of epithelial polarity in three-dimensional cultures [19,20].
Additionally, ROCK regulates focal adhesion kinase (FAK) activity, thereby facilitating integrin-dependent adhesion and dynamic cell motility. This ROCK-FAK pathway is particularly important during organoid expansion and matrix remodeling, as cells continually re-establish contacts with their surrounding extracellular environment [21].
Furthermore, ROCK modulates the phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN)-AKT pathway, a key regulator of cell survival and proliferation. By influencing PTEN, ROCK indirectly controls AKT (also known as protein kinase B) activity. This mechanism is crucial for balancing survival and apoptotic signals, particularly during the early stages of organoid formation when dissociated stem cells are highly vulnerable to cell death [22].
Beyond these specific cascades, Rho/ROCK signaling is an integral component of broader mechanotransduction networks. Notably, it interfaces with the Hippo signaling pathway, impacting yes-associated protein/transcriptional coactivator with PDZ-binding motif (YAP/TAZ) activity. This cross-regulation plays an important role in stem cell fate decisions, proliferation, and spatial tissue patterning [23,24].
In summary, these interlinked mechanisms establish Rho/ROCK signaling as a master regulator of the physical and biochemical processes underlying organoid morphogenesis. Therefore, fine-tuning ROCK activity is essential for supporting cell survival, differentiation, and proper tissue organization. Disruption of this balance—whether by excessive inhibition or constitutive activation—can compromise the structural integrity and biological fidelity of organoids (Fig. 1) [25,26].

Crosstalk with Ras and other pathways

Rho/ROCK signaling does not operate in isolation; it interacts with other key signaling cascades to fine-tune cellular responses during organoid development. Among these, the Ras-mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway stands out as a significant counterpart. While RhoA predominantly regulates cytoskeletal organization and contractility, Ras promotes cell proliferation and survival via the RAF-MEK-ERK signaling cascade [27]. The interplay between Rho and Ras signaling is complex and context-dependent, displaying both cooperative and antagonistic interactions. For example, active Ras signaling can suppress RhoA activity through the activation of p190RhoGAP (GTPase-activating protein), reducing cellular contractility and fostering a more migratory or proliferative phenotype [28,29]. This antagonism is especially apparent during epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, where suppression of Rho activity enhances cell mobility. Conversely, cytoskeletal changes mediated by RhoA can influence the spatial distribution and activation dynamics of Ras effectors. Tension-induced alterations in actin architecture affect the localization of scaffold proteins such as kinase suppressor of Ras, modulating the intensity and duration of ERK activation [30]. These feedback loops underscore the importance of cytoskeletal context in shaping mitogenic signals (Fig. 2).
Beyond Ras, Rho/ROCK signaling also interacts with the Hippo pathway, particularly through the mechanical regulation of YAP and TAZ. ROCK-induced cytoskeletal tension promotes the nuclear localization of YAP/TAZ, thereby enhancing the transcription of genes associated with proliferation and differentiation [31]. This intersection indicates the presence of a mechanochemical feedback network, where matrix stiffness, RhoA activation, and Ras signaling converge to direct organoid morphogenesis.
In organoid cultures, a balanced interplay between Rho/ROCK and Ras signaling is crucial. Excessive Ras activity without corresponding mechanical cues can lead to uncontrolled proliferation, while hyperactive RhoA/ROCK signaling may inhibit expansion or result in abnormal morphology [32]. Thus, fine-tuned crosstalk between these pathways is vital for maintaining the equilibrium between stem cell renewal and differentiation, ultimately preserving tissue architecture and function.

Mechanobiology and extracellular matrix interactions

Organoid development is governed not only by biochemical signals but also by mechanical cues derived from the extracellular matrix (ECM). The mechanobiology of stem cells—how they sense and respond to physical forces—plays a critical role in determining organoid structure, polarity, and lineage specification [33-36].
The Rho/ROCK pathway functions as a critical mechanotransducer, converting physical inputs from the ECM into intracellular signals. ECM stiffness is detected via integrins, which connect the external matrix to the actin cytoskeleton through focal adhesions. Mechanical loading or substrate tension activates integrins, which in turn stimulate FAK and subsequently trigger RhoA signaling [37,38]. Activated RhoA then activates ROCK, promoting actomyosin contractility via MLC phosphorylation and thereby reinforcing cytoskeletal tension [39]. This dynamic feedback loop enables cells to adjust their shape, polarity, and adhesion in response to the matrix environment. In softer ECM conditions, reduced ROCK activity leads to lower tension, preserving stemness, whereas stiffer matrices increase contractility and drive stem cell differentiation toward epithelial or mesenchymal lineages [40].
Furthermore, ECM stiffness modulates Hippo signaling by affecting the nuclear localization of YAP and TAZ. In rigid matrices, increased cytoskeletal stress due to ROCK activation favors YAP/TAZ translocation into the nucleus, thereby promoting gene expression associated with proliferation and tissue growth [23]. In organoid systems, controlling matrix mechanics is crucial for directing morphogenesis. Hydrogels with adjustable stiffness have been utilized to fine-tune Rho/ROCK activity and replicate tissue-specific microenvironments. For instance, intestinal and hepatic organoids exhibit different responses to ECM density, underscoring the need for precise biomechanical design in organoid engineering [41].
In summary, Rho/ROCK-mediated mechanosensing serves as a central integrator of ECM stiffness, cytoskeletal dynamics, and transcriptional responses, making it indispensable for designing and optimizing physiologically relevant organoid models.

Applications and limitations of ROCK inhibition

The use of ROCK inhibitors, particularly Y-27632 and fasudil, has become a standard component in many organoid protocols because of their ability to enhance stem cell survival, reduce dissociation-induced apoptosis, and improve clonogenicity during the early stages of organoid formation. These inhibitors suppress RhoA-ROCK-MLC-mediated actomyosin contractility, thereby reducing cellular tension and enabling epithelial cells to aggregate and survive after single-cell dissociation (Table 1) [16,42]. This effect is especially critical during initial plating and passaging, when cells experience mechanical stress or suboptimal adhesion conditions.
ROCK inhibition has been widely employed across various organoid systems to enhance initial cell survival and support early morphogenesis. In intestinal organoids, Y-27632 increases the viability of Lgr5⁺ stem cells and promotes crypt-like budding. In liver and pancreas models, it supports the expansion of EpCAM⁺ hepatic progenitors and facilitates organoid establishment from limited patient-derived samples. In lung and airway organoids, ROCK inhibition prevents anoikis in basal stem cells, while in neural systems, it reduces apoptosis and improves the uniformity of cerebral organoid spheres during early culture (Table 2) [43-47].
Although transient use of ROCK inhibitors is crucial for early organoid establishment, prolonged or unregulated exposure can cause undesirable effects that compromise tissue development and fidelity. One significant limitation is the potential disruption of epithelial morphogenesis. Sustained inhibition of the RhoA-ROCK-MLC pathway reduces actomyosin contractility, which is essential for epithelial folding, lumen formation, and overall structural integrity during organoid maturation [48].
Another concern is the delayed or incomplete differentiation of stem cells. ROCK inhibition can interfere with the cytoskeletal remodeling necessary for lineage specification, leading to the persistence of progenitor-like states or skewed differentiation trajectories [49]. This effect is particularly problematic in long-term cultures, where precise temporal transitions between cell states are required to mimic in vivo development. In some systems, excessive ROCK suppression results in aberrant tissue architecture, including flattened, cystic, or multilayered structures that deviate from the physiological morphology of the target organ [41]. These anomalies are attributed to the loss of mechanical tension, which normally guides coordinated growth and polarity cues within the organoid.
Therefore, a strategic approach is needed when incorporating ROCK inhibitors into organoid protocols. Most studies recommend limiting their use to the first 24 to 48 hours after seeding or passaging, followed by withdrawal to permit natural morphogenic processes to resume. Additionally, combining ROCK inhibition with biomimetic ECM environments or temporal gene control systems may mitigate these limitations and improve organoid reproducibility [50].

Perspectives

Future research should integrate single-cell omics, live imaging, and biomechanical assays to map the spatiotemporal activity of Rho. Genetic manipulations (e.g., CRISPR targeting of ROCK1/2), in combination with tunable ECM systems, may provide a precise approach to enhance reproducibility and complexity in organoid cultures. This strategy will facilitate translational applications ranging from personalized disease modeling to therapeutic tissue engineering (Fig. 3). Rho/ROCK signaling is indispensable for the successful generation and maturation of organoids. Its diverse functions in regulating cytoskeletal dynamics, adhesion, and mechanosensation position it as a central hub in stem cell and organoid biology. By harnessing its modulatory potential, researchers can refine organoid systems to more closely mimic physiological conditions, thereby advancing both basic science and clinical applications.

NOTES

Conflict of interest

Cho-Rok Jung is a member of the editorial board of this journal. She was not involved in the editorial review or decision-making process for this manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (RS-2023-00225239), and by the Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology (KRIBB) Research Initiative Program (KGM4722533).

Authors’ contributions

Conceptualization: all authors; Visualization: all authors; Writing-original draft: all authors; Writing-review & editing: all authors.

Additional contributions

The figures were created using the Mind the Graph platform (www.mindthegraph.com).

Data availability

Please reach out to the corresponding author to inquire about the availability of data.

Fig. 1.
Overview of Rho/Rho-associated coiled-coil containing protein kinase (ROCK) pathway in organoids. This figure illustrates the key molecular interactions in the Rho/ROCK pathway, including downstream effectors such as myosin light chain (MLC), LIM domain kinase (LIMK), and focal adhesion kinase (FAK), and highlights its role in cytoskeletal dynamics and stem cell behavior. F-actin, filamentous actin; PTEN, phosphatase and tensin homolog.
organoid-2025-5-e4f1.jpg
Fig. 2.
The complexity of Rho/Rho-associated coiled-coil containing protein kinase (ROCK) signaling. This diagram depicts the crosstalk between Rho/ROCK and diverse cellular pathways. Same-colored circles share similar cellular functions. RhoA, Ras homolog family member A; FAK, focal adhesion kinase; PTEN, phosphatase and tensin homolog; MLC, myosin light chain; YAP/TAZ, yes-associated protein/transcriptional coactivator with PDZ-binding motif; TGF, transforming growth factor; Wnt, wingless/integrated; PI3K, phosphoinositide 3-kinase; AKT, protein kinase B; LIMK, LIM domain kinase; Ras, Rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog; MEK, MAP/ERK kinase; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase; EMT, epithelial-mesenchymal transition.
organoid-2025-5-e4f2.jpg
Fig. 3.
Perspectives on the role of the Rho/Rho-associated coiled-coil containing protein kinase (ROCK) signaling in future organoid research. This diagram explains how Rho/ROCK signaling will be handled for various applications. ECM, extracellular matrix.
organoid-2025-5-e4f3.jpg
Table 1.
Key ROCK inhibitors and their applications
Inhibitor Mechanism Applications in organoids
Y-27632 Selective ROCK1/2 inhibitor Promotes stem cell survival, supports organoid formation
Fasudil ROCK inhibition via ATP-competitive binding Reduces fibrosis, promotes neural regeneration
Thiazovivin Targets ROCK-mediated cytoskeletal contraction Improves epithelial integrity in culture

ROCK, Rho-associated coiled-coil containing protein kinase.

Table 2.
Organ-specific applications of ROCK inhibition in organoid culture
Organ system Target cell type Application of ROCK inhibition Reference
Intestine Lgr5⁺ intestinal stem cells Enhances survival post-isolation and supports crypt-like morphogenesis [43]
Liver EpCAM⁺ hepatic progenitors Promotes efficient expansion and long-term culture [44]
Pancreas Pancreatic ductal cells Facilitates organoid formation from patient-derived low-input samples [45]
Lung/airway Basal epithelial stem cells Prevents anoikis and promotes initial colony formation [46]
Brain Neural progenitor cells Reduces apoptosis post-dissociation and improves uniform sphere formation [47]

ROCK, Rho-associated coiled-coil containing protein kinase.

References

1. O'Laughlin R, Cheng F, Song H, Ming GL. Bioengineering tools for next-generation neural organoids. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2025;92:103011.
crossref pmid
2. Bartfeld S, Clevers H. Stem cell-derived organoids and their application for medical research and patient treatment. J Mol Med (Berl) 2017;95:729-38.
crossref pmid pdf
3. Rossi G, Manfrin A, Lutolf MP. Progress and potential in organoid research. Nat Rev Genet 2018;19:671-87.
crossref pmid pdf
4. Xu H, Lyu X, Yi M, Zhao W, Song Y, Wu K. Organoid technology and applications in cancer research. J Hematol Oncol 2018;11:116.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
5. Ida Y, Hikage F, Ohguro H. ROCK inhibitors enhance the production of large lipid-enriched 3D organoids of 3T3-L1 cells. Sci Rep 2021;11:5479.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
6. Viola JM, Liu J, Huang A, Grindel SH, Prahl LS, Hughes AJ. Rho/ROCK activity tunes cell compartment segregation and differentiation in nephron-forming niches [Preprint]. Posted 2023 Nov 10. bioRxiv 2023.11.08.566308. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.08.566308.
crossref pmid
7. Pierzchalska M, Panek M, Grabacka M. The migration and fusion events related to ROCK activity strongly influence the morphology of chicken embryo intestinal organoids. Protoplasma 2019;256:575-81.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
8. Koslow M, O'Keefe KJ, Hosseini ZF, Nelson DA, Larsen M. ROCK inhibitor increases proacinar cells in adult salivary gland organoids. Stem Cell Res 2019;41:101608.
crossref pmid pmc
9. Wu X, Verschut V, Woest ME, Ng-Blichfeldt JP, Matias A, Villetti G, et al. Rho-kinase 1/2 inhibition prevents transforming growth factor-β-induced effects on pulmonary remodeling and repair. Front Pharmacol 2021;11:609509.
crossref pmid pmc
10. Lowe A, Harris R, Bhansali P, Cvekl A, Liu W. Intercellular adhesion-dependent cell survival and ROCK-regulated actomyosin-driven forces mediate self-formation of a retinal organoid. Stem Cell Reports 2016;6:743-56.
crossref pmid pmc
11. Ouchi T, Morimura S, Dow LE, Miyoshi H, Udey MC. EpCAM (CD326) regulates intestinal epithelial integrity and stem cells via rho-associated kinase. Cells 2021;10:256.
crossref pmid pmc
12. Harbom LJ, Rudisill TL, Michel N, Litwa KA, Beenhakker MP, McConnell MJ. The effect of rho kinase inhibition on morphological and electrophysiological maturity in iPSC-derived neurons. Cell Tissue Res 2019;375:641-54.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
13. Ma Y, Lin M, Huang G, Li Y, Wang S, Bai G, et al. 3D spatiotemporal mechanical microenvironment: a hydrogel-based platform for guiding stem cell fate. Adv Mater 2018;30:e1705911.
crossref pmid pdf
14. Etienne-Manneville S, Hall A. Rho GTPases in cell biology. Nature 2002;420:629-35.
crossref pmid pdf
15. Amano M, Ito M, Kimura K, Fukata Y, Chihara K, Nakano T, et al. Phosphorylation and activation of myosin by Rho-associated kinase (Rho-kinase). J Biol Chem 1996;271:20246-9.
crossref pmid
16. Watanabe K, Ueno M, Kamiya D, Nishiyama A, Matsumura M, Wataya T, et al. A ROCK inhibitor permits survival of dissociated human embryonic stem cells. Nat Biotechnol 2007;25:681-6.
crossref pmid pdf
17. Lee BH, Seijo-Barandiaran I, Grapin-Botton A. Epithelial morphogenesis in organoids. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2022;72:30-7.
crossref pmid
18. Petzold J, Gentleman E. Intrinsic mechanical cues and their impact on stem cells and embryogenesis. Front Cell Dev Biol 2021;9:761871.
crossref pmid pmc
19. Maekawa M, Ishizaki T, Boku S, Watanabe N, Fujita A, Iwamatsu A, et al. Signaling from Rho to the actin cytoskeleton through protein kinases ROCK and LIM-kinase. Science 1999;285:895-8.
crossref pmid
20. Yang N, Higuchi O, Ohashi K, Nagata K, Wada A, Kangawa K, et al. Cofilin phosphorylation by LIM-kinase 1 and its role in Rac-mediated actin reorganization. Nature 1998;393:809-12.
crossref pmid pdf
21. Riento K, Ridley AJ. Rocks: multifunctional kinases in cell behaviour. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2003;4:446-56.
crossref pmid pdf
22. Yin P, Jiang Z, Wang X, Gong S, Zhang C, Fan Z. Fasudil protects spiral ganglion neurons and hair cells against cisplatin-induced apoptosis by inhibiting reactive oxygen species accumulation and regulating the ROCK/PTEN/AKT signaling pathway. Toxicol Res (Camb) 2025;14:tfaf030.
crossref pmid pdf
23. Dupont S, Morsut L, Aragona M, Enzo E, Giulitti S, Cordenonsi M, et al. Role of YAP/TAZ in mechanotransduction. Nature 2011;474:179-83.
crossref pmid pdf
24. Moya IM, Halder G. Hippo-YAP/TAZ signalling in organ regeneration and regenerative medicine. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2019;20:211-26.
crossref pmid pdf
25. Steward AJ, Kelly DJ. Mechanical regulation of mesenchymal stem cell differentiation. J Anat 2015;227:717-31.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
26. He S, Lei P, Kang W, Cheung P, Xu T, Mana M, et al. Stiffness regulates intestinal stem cell fate [Preprint]. Posted 2021 Mar 16. bioRxiv 2021.03.15.435410. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.15.435410.
crossref
27. Downward J. Targeting RAS signalling pathways in cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer 2003;3:11-22.
crossref pmid pdf
28. Sordella R, Jiang W, Chen GC, Curto M, Settleman J. Modulation of Rho GTPase signaling regulates a switch between adipogenesis and myogenesis. Cell 2003;113:147-58.
crossref pmid
29. Guillemot L, Paschoud S, Jond L, Foglia A, Citi S. Paracingulin regulates the activity of Rac1 and RhoA GTPases by recruiting Tiam1 and GEF-H1 to epithelial junctions. Mol Biol Cell 2008;19:4442-53.
crossref pmid pmc
30. Omerovic J, Hammond DE, Clague MJ, Prior IA. Ras isoform abundance and signalling in human cancer cell lines. Oncogene 2008;27:2754-62.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
31. Liu Z, Li S, Qian X, Li L, Zhang H, Liu Z. RhoA/ROCK-YAP/TAZ axis regulates the fibrotic activity in dexamethasone-treated human trabecular meshwork cells. Front Mol Biosci 2021;8:728932.
crossref pmid pmc
32. Ke X, Do DC, Li C, Zhao Y, Kollarik M, Fu Q, et al. Ras homolog family member A/Rho-associated protein kinase 1 signaling modulates lineage commitment of mesenchymal stem cells in asthmatic patients through lymphoid enhancer-binding factor 1. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2019;143:1560-74.
crossref pmid pmc
33. D'Angelo F, Tiribuzi R, Armentano I, Kenny JM, Martino S, Orlacchio A. Mechanotransduction: tuning stem cells fate. J Funct Biomater 2011;2:67-87.
crossref pmid pmc
34. Tortorella I, Argentati C, Emiliani C, Martino S, Morena F. The role of physical cues in the development of stem cell-derived organoids. Eur Biophys J 2022;51:105-17.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
35. Zhang X, Zhang S, Wang T. How the mechanical microenvironment of stem cell growth affects their differentiation: A review. Stem Cell Res Ther 2022;13:415.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
36. Onfroy-Roy L, Hamel D, Foncy J, Malaquin L, Ferrand A. Extracellular matrix mechanical properties and regulation of the intestinal stem cells: when mechanics control fate. Cells 2020;9:2629.
crossref pmid pmc
37. Discher DE, Janmey P, Wang YL. Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate. Science 2005;310:1139-43.
crossref pmid
38. Geiger B, Spatz JP, Bershadsky AD. Environmental sensing through focal adhesions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2009;10:21-33.
crossref pmid pdf
39. Paszek MJ, Zahir N, Johnson KR, Lakins JN, Rozenberg GI, Gefen A, et al. Tensional homeostasis and the malignant phenotype. Cancer Cell 2005;8:241-54.
crossref pmid
40. Gjorevski N, Sachs N, Manfrin A, Giger S, Bragina ME, Ordóñez-Morán P, et al. Designer matrices for intestinal stem cell and organoid culture. Nature 2016;539:560-4.
crossref pmid pdf
41. Cruz-Acuña R, Quirós M, Farkas AE, Dedhia PH, Huang S, Siuda D, et al. Synthetic hydrogels for human intestinal organoid generation and colonic wound repair. Nat Cell Biol 2017;19:1326-35.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
42. Ohgushi M, Matsumura M, Eiraku M, Murakami K, Aramaki T, Nishiyama A, et al. Molecular pathway and cell state responsible for dissociation-induced apoptosis in human pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 2010;7:225-39.
crossref pmid
43. Sato T, Vries RG, Snippert HJ, van de Wetering M, Barker N, Stange DE, et al. Single Lgr5 stem cells build crypt-villus structures in vitro without a mesenchymal niche. Nature 2009;459:262-5.
crossref pmid
44. Huch M, Gehart H, van Boxtel R, Hamer K, Blokzijl F, Verstegen MM, et al. Long-term culture of genome-stable bipotent stem cells from adult human liver. Cell 2015;160:299-312.
crossref pmid pmc
45. Boj SF, Hwang CI, Baker LA, Chio II, Engle DD, Corbo V, et al. Organoid models of human and mouse ductal pancreatic cancer. Cell 2015;160:324-38.
crossref pmid pmc
46. Sachs N, Papaspyropoulos A, Zomer-van Ommen DD, Heo I, Böttinger L, Klay D, et al. Long-term expanding human airway organoids for disease modeling. EMBO J 2019;38:e100300.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
47. Qian X, Nguyen HN, Song MM, Hadiono C, Ogden SC, Hammack C, et al. Brain-region-specific organoids using mini-bioreactors for modeling ZIKV exposure. Cell 2016;165:1238-54.
crossref pmid pmc
48. Kalaji R, Wheeler AP, Erasmus JC, Lee SY, Endres RG, Cramer LP, et al. ROCK1 and ROCK2 regulate epithelial polarisation and geometric cell shape. Biol Cell 2012;104:435-51.
crossref pmid
49. Srinivasan S, Das S, Surve V, Srivastava A, Kumar S, Jain N, et al. Blockade of ROCK inhibits migration of human primary keratinocytes and malignant epithelial skin cells by regulating actomyosin contractility. Sci Rep 2019;9:19930.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
50. Jain A, Gut G, Sanchis-Calleja F, Okamoto R, Streib S, He Z, et al. Morphodynamics of human early brain organoid development [Preprint]. Posted 2023 Aug 22. bioRxiv 2023.08.21.553827. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.08.21.553827.
crossref


ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
FOR CONTRIBUTORS
Editorial Office
Room 319, Hall 1 of Chonbuk National University Dental College, 20, Geonji-ro, Deokjin-gu, Jeonju 54907, Korea
Tel: +82-63-270-4024    E-mail: editor@j-organoid.org                

Copyright © 2025 by The Organoid Society.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next